| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chanueting
Joined: 26 Nov 2008
Posts: 1
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: NAT-PMP instead of UPNP? |
 |
|
I get this part of message in my transmission:
| Code: | Wed Nov 26 21:00:47 2008 Port Forwarding (NAT-PMP) initnatpmp succeeded (0)
Wed Nov 26 21:00:47 2008 Port Forwarding (NAT-PMP) sendpublicaddressrequest succeeded (2)
Wed Nov 26 21:00:55 2008 Port Forwarding State changed from "Not forwarded" to "Starting"
Wed Nov 26 21:00:55 2008 Port Forwarding Opened port 49524 to listen for incoming peer connections
Wed Nov 26 21:02:13 2008 Fedora-10-i386-DVD Got 80 peers from tracker
Wed Nov 26 21:02:56 2008 Port Forwarding State changed from "Starting" to "???" |
Instead of trying UPnP in my router first, transmission trying to have NAT-PMP linkage. However, there is no NAT-PMP provided in my router, is it a bug? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nuclight
Joined: 17 Jan 2008
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 10:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's definitely not a bug that it tries NAT-PMP first, but that is a bug that it does not revert to UPnP when receives no answer - there are so many routers which support UPnP but not NAT-PMP.
However you should check if that is configurable and just disabled, before reporting the bug to transmission's authors.
_________________
WBR, Nuclear Lightning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
