View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
twear
Joined: 01 Nov 2012 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:55 pm Post subject: Alive advertisement for non existent device/service |
|
|
WANPPPConnection
fromd UDA-1.1.1:
Quote: | ALIVE advertisement message for non-existing device/service ("uuid:e3c41abc-5951-4924-a650-b49ded3450dc::urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANPPPConnection:1") detected (not defined in device description X.. |
The same test case also give this error:
UUID is not unique among all embedded devices |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
twear
Joined: 01 Nov 2012 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah I'm sure it would be.
For the WANPPPConnection, is that something wich is used in IGv2? since I am only testing IGDv1 right now... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
twear wrote: | For the WANPPPConnection, is that something wich is used in IGv2? since I am only testing IGDv1 right now... |
No I think WANPPPConnection is quite deprecated now. _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twear
Joined: 01 Nov 2012 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unfortunately using strict is how I am able to conform to most of the tests. I'm not sure what the best method would be... It's up to you, I can always comment it out for now. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
twear wrote: | Unfortunately using strict is how I am able to conform to most of the tests. I'm not sure what the best method would be... It's up to you, I can always comment it out for now. |
I don't understand what is the problem...
If using UPNP_STRICT, WanPPPConnection will not be advertised, if not "strict" it will be advertised so it works with buggy control points. _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twear
Joined: 01 Nov 2012 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
So right now I use UPNP_STRICT to conform to the UPnP tests, because it enable's a lot of the functionality for the tests. Having the WANPPPConnection a part of UPNP_STRICT makes that test fail though.
it's not a huge deal, I can just comment it out for my version, but i hope that explains it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
twear wrote: | So right now I use UPNP_STRICT to conform to the UPnP tests, because it enable's a lot of the functionality for the tests. Having the WANPPPConnection a part of UPNP_STRICT makes that test fail though.
|
But precisely WANPPPConnection is NOT part of UPNP_STRICT.
that is why there is Code: | #ifndef UPNP_STRICT |
(see #ifndef !) _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
twear
Joined: 01 Nov 2012 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
man, i must have been tired last night didn't see the N |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|