miniupnp.tuxfamily.org

[a_big_friend]

I see that in one build of wive-ng-rtnl, that uses miniupnp, in the miniupnpd.conf was used the following rule:

allow 1024-65535 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 1024-65535

Do you think it is ok expressing the IP/MASK as 192.168.1.1/255.255.255.0 or it should had been used instead the format 192.168.1.1/24

as in:

allow 1024-65535 192.168.1.1/24 1024-65535

[miniupnp]

The only correct syntax is

[miniupnp]

I updated the code an added more checks : https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/0cc68c47b65cb4dcb5ce4ed0ef2fd991dd6ad297

Maybe I should add the code to parse the form 1.2.3.4/255.255.255.0 after all... if it is already used by some people.
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/

[a_big_friend]