miniupnp.tuxfamily.org Forum Index miniupnp.tuxfamily.org
The forum about miniupnp and libnatpmp
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Alive advertisement for non existent device/service

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    miniupnp.tuxfamily.org Forum Index -> miniupnpd Bugs
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
twear



Joined: 01 Nov 2012
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 8:55 pm    Post subject: Alive advertisement for non existent device/service Reply with quote

WANPPPConnection
fromd UDA-1.1.1:
Quote:
ALIVE advertisement message for non-existing device/service ("uuid:e3c41abc-5951-4924-a650-b49ded3450dc::urn:schemas-upnp-org:service:WANPPPConnection:1") detected (not defined in device description X..


The same test case also give this error:
UUID is not unique among all embedded devices
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miniupnp
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 1452

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will have a look at it...
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
miniupnp
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 1452

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

look at this patch : https://github.com/miniupnp/miniupnp/commit/74c3c18380239aef6aab7a3b5fb2fdb7cbcd27a6

about the same UUID being used by all embeded devices, it is more difficult to fix Sad
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
twear



Joined: 01 Nov 2012
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah I'm sure it would be.

For the WANPPPConnection, is that something wich is used in IGv2? since I am only testing IGDv1 right now...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miniupnp
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 1452

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 5:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

twear wrote:
For the WANPPPConnection, is that something wich is used in IGv2? since I am only testing IGDv1 right now...

No I think WANPPPConnection is quite deprecated now.
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
twear



Joined: 01 Nov 2012
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unfortunately using strict is how I am able to conform to most of the tests. I'm not sure what the best method would be... It's up to you, I can always comment it out for now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miniupnp
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 1452

PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 11:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

twear wrote:
Unfortunately using strict is how I am able to conform to most of the tests. I'm not sure what the best method would be... It's up to you, I can always comment it out for now.

I don't understand what is the problem...
If using UPNP_STRICT, WanPPPConnection will not be advertised, if not "strict" it will be advertised so it works with buggy control points.
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
twear



Joined: 01 Nov 2012
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So right now I use UPNP_STRICT to conform to the UPnP tests, because it enable's a lot of the functionality for the tests. Having the WANPPPConnection a part of UPNP_STRICT makes that test fail though.

it's not a huge deal, I can just comment it out for my version, but i hope that explains it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
miniupnp
Site Admin


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 1452

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

twear wrote:
So right now I use UPNP_STRICT to conform to the UPnP tests, because it enable's a lot of the functionality for the tests. Having the WANPPPConnection a part of UPNP_STRICT makes that test fail though.

But precisely WANPPPConnection is NOT part of UPNP_STRICT.
that is why there is
Code:
#ifndef UPNP_STRICT

(see #ifndef !)
_________________
Main miniUPnP author.
http://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
twear



Joined: 01 Nov 2012
Posts: 80

PostPosted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 4:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

man, i must have been tired last night didn't see the N
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    miniupnp.tuxfamily.org Forum Index -> miniupnpd Bugs All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP
© 2007 Thomas Bernard, author of MiniUPNP.