View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jensenbreck
Joined: 09 Nov 2017 Posts: 2 Location: New york
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:30 pm Post subject: Being Nice To Servers |
|
|
UPNP is too messy and overcomplicated for such simple thing as opening a port. On the other hand NAT-PMP is simple and more useful (e.g will announce router IP change). If there is somebody willing to test I could prepare a patch. I agree about UPNP being overcomplicated but how many routers are currently using NAT-PMP? Is NAT-PMP a common feature?
I didn't find the right solution from the internet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1585
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't understand what you propose... _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|