View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
leuk_he
Joined: 27 Apr 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:22 pm Post subject: Fail to add mapping on thompson speedtouch 780 |
|
|
Hello.
When using the upnpc program it fails to create a mapping for me. But there are no obvoous bugs...
Quote: | ]
upnpc : miniupnp test client. (c) 2006-2007 Thomas Bernard
Go to http: miniupnp.free.fr/ or http:xx miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/
for more information.
List of UPNP devices found on the network :
desc: http://192.168.1.254:80/upnp/IGD.xml
st: urn:schemas-upnp-org:device:InternetGatewayDevice:1
Found valid IGD : http://192.168.1.254:80/upnp/control/igd/wanpppcInternet
Local LAN ip address : 192.168.1.66
ExternalIPAddress = 82.95.xxx.xx
InternalIP:Port = 192.168.1.66:2208
external 82.95.xxx.xx:2208 is redirected to internal 192.168.1.66:2208
|
most typical:
SO it seems to be added, and if i ignore the case, the url seems right, but the NATP mapping is not there.
This is the most compatible device i have. windows upnp, ok, pupnplib ok, but miniupnp fails.
some background, i am adding (have aded) miniupnp to this test program:
http://forum.emule-project.net/index.php?showtopic=135058
(miniupno support is in the svn version)
I can provide full logs of other programs that are working, but do you have any hints to start with?
PS forum Url protection on first post sucks! I know,spammers suck more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
that is indeed strange because the upnpc -l output is correct.
What is the output of upnpc -l if you add One redirection with windows upnp, one with pupnplib and one with miniupnc ??
Also you can check that the redirection is correctly set in the properties of the IGD device from windows network connections panel.
PS : sorry for the url protection on 1st post... you shouldn't be annoyed by it any more _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leuk_he
Joined: 27 Apr 2008 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, found it..
Too stupid to spend so much time on. It removes the mapping because in my test code accidentally i called the removemapping. Fixed
My mistake...
BTW, sometimes you use "SOAP-ENV" tagging in the xml markup, sometimes just the "s" . Any reason? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
miniupnp Site Admin
Joined: 14 Apr 2007 Posts: 1589
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
leuk_he wrote: | BTW, sometimes you use "SOAP-ENV" tagging in the xml markup, sometimes just the "s" . Any reason? |
I started with "SOAP-ENV" everywhere but "s" is shorter so... _________________ Main miniUPnP author.
https://miniupnp.tuxfamily.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|